After Manchester United’s 3-1 loss to local rivals Manchester City, manager Erik ten Hag made headlines with his post-match assertions that the gap in quality between the two clubs was not substantial. However, a deeper analysis of the game and United’s recent performances raises questions about Ten Hag’s suitability for the Old Trafford hot seat.
Ten Hag’s Bold Claims
In his recent media appearances, Ten Hag has been outspoken, from praising Antony as “unstoppable” to requesting an apology from Fulham over a TikTok post targeting Bruno Fernandes. However, his attempt to downplay the disparity between United and City after the defeat has raised eyebrows among fans and pundits alike.
Reality Check: Statistical Discrepancies
Despite leading for 48 minutes in the Manchester derby, United’s performance at the Etihad Stadium was far from convincing. The statistics revealed a stark contrast to Ten Hag’s narrative, with United having only 26% possession, three attempts on goal (just one on target), and City dominating with 27 shots and 100% possession in the opening five minutes.
Problematic Playing Style
United’s approach against City mirrored previous encounters with top teams, adopting a defensive and limited style. This conservative strategy has been evident in matches against Tottenham and Luton Town. The lack of attacking prowess and possession-based play does not align with the expectations for a club of United’s stature and resources.
Regression Under Ten Hag
Ten Hag’s first season at United showed promise, securing a Carabao Cup triumph, a third-place Premier League finish, and an FA Cup final appearance. However, the current campaign has seen regression, with the team three places lower in the league compared to the same period last season, holding fewer points, and diminished hopes for a top-four finish.
Challenging Statistics
Under Ten Hag, United’s struggles against top-nine teams away from home are evident, winning just once in nearly two seasons. City’s dominance since Pep Guardiola took charge in 2016 further accentuates the gulf between the Manchester rivals. City has accumulated 154 more points, won 62 more league games, and scored 243 more goals than United during this period.
Ineffective Transfer Strategy
Despite being granted substantial funds for transfers, Ten Hag’s acquisitions have raised concerns. High-profile signings like Antony and Mason Mount have failed to make a significant impact, with Antony particularly highlighted as one of the biggest transfer mistakes in Premier League history. Only Lisandro Martinez has shown consistent form, but injuries have disrupted his contributions.
INEOS’s Evaluation Looms
INEOS’s recent acquisition of a 28% stake in United has initiated a comprehensive evaluation of the club. CEO Sir Jim Ratcliffe and director of sport Sir Dave Brailsford have been meticulous in their assessments. Although there is no immediate indication of Ten Hag’s departure, the lack of a clear vote of confidence suggests he is under scrutiny.
Time Running Out for Ten Hag
With United’s strategic review completed and new leadership in place, Ten Hag’s time to prove his managerial prowess is running out. The arrival of Omar Berrada as CEO and potential additions to the coaching staff, such as Dan Ashworth, signal a new direction for the club. Ten Hag’s inability to bridge the gap with City and Liverpool, coupled with tactical concerns, could prompt a managerial change.
A Call for Transparency
In light of the uncertainties surrounding Ten Hag’s future and INEOS’s strategic vision, United should consider following the examples set by Liverpool, Barcelona, and Bayern Munich. Announcing that Ten Hag will step down at the end of the season could bring clarity to the situation. With INEOS’s ambitions to challenge City and Liverpool, a change in leadership might be the necessary catalyst for United’s resurgence.
